2.5.1. Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode


The examination guideines in continuous internal assessment are prescribed by the affiliating university, JNTUK and the institute strictly adheres to the rules and regultions set by the university. Apart from these, the institute carries out assessment procedures such as quizzes, tests to assess the students.

Distribution and Weightage of Marks (R16)

SL. NO. Distribution Frequency Description
1 Internal Tests Twice in a semester
Internal test 1
Q. No. 1 2 3
Marks 10 10 10
Internal test 2
Q. No. 1 2 3
Marks 10 10 10
  • DAC will ensure the quality of question and scheme of evaluation
  • The internal descriptive marks are reduced to 15 marks
2 Assignment Twice in a semester
  • Assignment 1 questions covering Unit 1-3 is given to students before the internal test1 to evaluate for 5 marks as per the rubric
  • Assignment 2 questions covering Unit 4-6 is given to students before the internal test2 to evaluate for 5 marks as per the rubric
3 Online quiz Twice in a semester
  • Quiz 1 of 20 questions covering unit 1-3 is conducted for the students during the internal test1 by JNTUK to evaluate for 10 marks
  • Quiz 2 of 20 questions covering unit 4-6 is conducted for the students during the internal test2 by JNTUK to evaluate for 10 marks
  • The total marks secured by the student in each mid-term examination are evaluated for 30 marks
  • The marks secured by the students from the above internal tests 1 & 2 (Descriptive + Objective + Assignment) are finally considered as 80% of the best and 20% of the other
  • Final internal Marks = (Best of (Mid-1/Mid-2) marks x 0.8 + Least of (Mid-1/Mid-2) marks x 0.2)

The evaluation process is transparent and robust through the following procedures:

  • Students are informed of the academic regulations published in the Student handbook at the beginning of the course and in the college website.
  • More information regarding the academic guidelines for the four year B.Tech degree course issued by affiliating university is conveyed through the website, LMS and examination section.
  • College’s academic calendar is prepared based on the Academic calendar provided by the affiliating university and it includes examination schedule as provided by the university.
  • The schedules of all the internal assessments and End semester examinations are communicated to students and faculty through the college website, notice boards and e-mails. The evaluation procedure followed in the assessments are disseminated through class committee meetings, rubrics etc.
  • Transparency of the evaluation process is maintained by following rubrics for assessment. The procedure include:
    • For evaluating internal descriptive offline examinations, a scheme of evaluation is prepared
    • Three stage verification process in finalizing the scheme of evaluation is rigorously followed in the college.
    • Preset rubrics form the basis for continuous assessment in the laboratory/ workshop/ engineering drawing.
    • Two assignments per subject per semester are evaluated according to the preset rubrics.
  • The college installed CCTV’s in each examination hall to check for any malpractice in addition to the invigilator’s presence.
  • ERP Software can be used by the parents to check their wards progress, attendance, marks and other academic details.
  • Internal examination marks are displayed in the notice boards for the students to check for any discrepancy and bring the same (in case of discrepancy) to the notice of the examination committee.

2.5.2. Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient


The institution takes extreme care to ensure that the examination related grievances are sorted out in a fair and transparent manner.

At the Institution level

  • In the case of internal examinations (theory subjects), the answer scripts after correction are distributed to the students of each class. If the students have any issue with regard to the marks posted in the script, they can discuss with the faculty concerned. If the issue is still not resolved, the matter is brought to the notice of the higher authorities for redressal.
  • The issues related to syllabus coverage, question paper setting, if any, can be discussed in the class committee meeting and can be brought to the notice of HoD for immediate necessary action.
  • In case of lab subjects, the continuous assessment is carried based on the rubrics informed to students in the beginning of the semester. Issues, if any regarding assessment can be sorted out on the basis of rubrics.
  • The assignment marks, internal marks and lab marks are finalized for assessments and displayed on the notice boards for the students to verify and point out discrepancies if any. The discrepancies will be sorted out by the faculty concerned.
  • The finalized marks after due verification by the examination section and approval by principal are uploaded to the university portal.

Process of grievances related to external mark evaluation

  • Any grievances related to semester end question paper (out of syllabus, repeated questions, improper split of marks, marks missed, wrong question number) are brought to the notice of the examination section. The section sends a letter to the university immediately if necessary. The university takes immediate action based on the grievance.
  • If a student is not satisfied with the marks allotted to her in the end examination, she can go for either revaluation or challenge valuation after paying the requisite fee to the university.
  • Grievances related to mistakes in certificates are handled by the examination branch by taking up the matter with the university.

2.5.2.1. Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. year wise during the last five years